When several positions of black feminists are taken into account, the genealogy of black feminist criticism seems to be in a dialectic process of two poles; race/gender-oriented interpretation and the neutral dominant theory. The critical position of the former focuses on the black female`s unique experience and character for correct and profound understanding of black women`s writings. On the other hand, the latter insists on using the dominant (white/male) theory in order to make black feminist criticism progress toward an academic field. Both approaches seem to conflict and the friction between them, i.e., a black female tradition and academic centrality has been rendered into an eclecticist position. This process is a political gesture of the marginalized to develop their critical status and enter into the dominant in the critical field, With a critical scrutinization of their positions and their arguments against each other, this paper shows that black feminist criticism is apt to work out double strategies, which are common not only in black and feminist literary criticism but also in gay and post-Colonial criticism. The strategies are found to throw their ideological inscription into relief by using the dominant theory constructed by white males. It would be rational to say that all minority critical discourses share "the same side of otherness" and that there are grounds for using the same strategy. Thus, it is moderately or highly probable that black feminism is classified under the rubric of postcolonialism. Hopefully, generalizing black feminist criticism from the perspective of postcolonialism, as this paper does, shall shed light on the prospect of black feminist criticism.