While beauty has traditionally been viewed as the value of art in the Western culture, many of artists either ignore beauty of spurn it. Beauty is not only in the world of art. It is all around us. It is true that everything natural as well as artificial should have its own beauty which all sorts of human beings in all varieties of life enjoy. It is true that Oriental Yelak(禮樂) as well as the Western Art went along with people. At the start both Yelak and Art aimed at the value that all sort of human beings should desire to be satisfied with livings in the world. But both Yelak and Art have long been associated with the high class(elite) and understood in contrast to the artistic enjoyment of common people. These aspects has made it reasoned that high art might have the type of beauty different from that of popular art. In the contemporary, however, the distinctions between high art and popular art has been challenged from various directions; especially, from new media which make aesthetic enjoyments popular. Therefore beauty belongs to not only the artistic value but also the daily living one. This is good enough reasons for thinking about the commercialism of beauty which every one enjoys. Commercialism is naturally interested in what all sorts of human beings enjoy. But owing to high art associated with elite social status and understood in contrast to commoners` aesthetic pleasures, all kinds of aesthetic refinements, residing with high art, have closed eyes to beauty that masses enjoy. Now in the contemporary world such as the haughtiness of `high art` is already falling down. This essay is to criticise the view of `high art` ignoring the aesthetic enjoyments of masses. The commercialism of beauty as the theme means that beauty has the commercial value because of its enjoyments of masses in terms of the daily living with all kinds of digital technological media which make artistic works brought into the world of commercial value.