The problem of this Study is that how is Min-jung imaged. We know that Min-jung is the oppressed differed the oppressing into halves, and reformer stand against the oppressing. But this study verify Min-jung is progressive elites`s ideological imaged-thing, and far criticize or reconsider Min-jung ideologies of Nation-literature-theory(民族文學論). The conception of ideological Min-jung is founded by Beak, Lak-cheong, Kim, ji-ha, and Shin, Kyeong-rim. In frist, conception of the citizen used in [Citizen-literature-theory] written by Beak, Lak-cheong is only his imaged-thing differed from general conception. Originally the conception of citizen is public that is being pursued reformer`s ideal in the France Revolution. By the way, Beak, Lak-cheong think citizen is universal concept and reformers in Korea history. In Second, Kim, ji-ha image that Min-jung is the oppressed or nation founded on suppression relation in [Satire, or Suicide]. He classify various social being in the oppressed and the oppressing. And he rebear Min-jung in nation. In third, Shin, Kyeong-rim show Min-jung`s image of literature pointed on korea modern literature, and consider Min-jung`s image of literature on the product reflected elite`s progressive consciousness in [Literation and Min-jung]. So his conception of the Min-jung is the oppressed founded in Kim, ji-ha`s conception of the Min-jung, and is imaged reformer stuck to reform wills. The unconscious and absolute supposition on Min-jung necessity in reconsideration. That Min-jung is the oppressed and reformer is a thinking proposed by 1960~80`s progressive elites. They fight against the center power in Min-jung`s name. In conclusion, Min-jung is a conception relative, not absolute.