글로버메뉴 바로가기 본문 바로가기 하단메뉴 바로가기

논문검색은 역시 페이퍼서치

> 한국금융법학회 > 금융법연구 > 6권 2호

보험계약자의 채권자에 의한 압류 및 추심명령에 근거한 보험계약 해지 등에 대한 소고

A Study on Surrender etc. by the Creditor of Policyholder through the Attachment and Collection Order

서재욱 ( Jae Wook Seo )

- 발행기관 : 한국금융법학회

- 발행년도 : 2009

- 간행물 : 금융법연구, 6권 2호

- 페이지 : pp.246-283 ( 총 38 페이지 )


학술발표대회집, 워크숍 자료집 중 1,2 페이지 논문은 ‘요약’만 제공되는 경우가 있으니,

구매 전에 간행물명, 페이지 수 확인 부탁 드립니다.

7,800
논문제목
초록(외국어)
Recently, the Supreme court held that it is possible that creditor of policyholder could get the attachment and collection order to all claims relating to insurance contract and surrender the insurance policy thereby directly. However, it is problem that the court permits creditor of policyholder to surrender the policy without any consent of policyholder or legal restriction. First of all, in compulsory execution law perspective, the way of surrender value into cash is discussed as three types; ① surrender the policy by surrogating the policyholder (Korea Civil Act chapter 404), ② special conversion order by court (Korea Civil Compulsory Execution law chapter 241), ③ direct surrender of creditor of policyholder by attachment and collection order. By the way, it is undesirable that the court admits of surrender the policy by surrogating the policyholder or direct surrender of creditor of policyholder by attachment and collection order in view of the nature of surrender value. In addition, at present the amendment bill of commercial act insurance chapter which contain the provision of prohibition on attachment of claim for life insurance is pending. Also in the light of this restriction of attachment, it is problem that the court permits creditor of policyholder to surrender the policy. And there are a lot of problems in the light of legal principles of insurance law. Above of all, if the court permits creditor of policyholder to surrender the policy without limit, insurance-related person is infringed on their rights unreasonably. Especially, beneficiary must be protected his legal rights in the lights of the nature of insurance contract, and many countries made the statutes that contain the contents of restriction to claim of creditor of policyholder for protecting the beneficiary. Also, it is desirable to admit the character of personal right about surrender insurance contract which is the basis of realization the surrender value. And it is questionable who has the right of claim for surrender value. In my opinion, it is determined one by one by the case who has the right. In conclusion, it is necessary to insert the provision of protection for beneficiary into law or insurance clause, and if necessary, it should be clearly prescribed that creditor of policyholder could not surrender the policy.

논문정보
  • - 주제 : 사회과학분야 > 법학
  • - 발행기관 : 한국금융법학회
  • - 간행물 : 금융법연구, 6권 2호
  • - 발행년도 : 2009
  • - 페이지 : pp.246-283 ( 총 38 페이지 )
  • - UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2012-320-001801516
저널정보
  • - 주제 : 사회과학분야 > 법학
  • - 성격 : 학술지
  • - 간기 : 연3회
  • - 국내 등재 : KCI 등재
  • - 해외 등재 : -
  • - ISSN : 1738-3706
  • - 수록범위 : 2004–2020
  • - 수록 논문수 : 355