This paper analysis the CRE 2010-7 of KICE and listening evaluations of NAEA from 2008 to 2010 and make some alternative plans. There are some problems in CRE and the evaluations. First, they evaluate only factual, inferential, and critical comprehension. Second, the discourse types of listening script for evaluation are stressed to instruction, speech, presentation and story. They take 68% of all discourses. Third, because they evaluate only comprehension, the evaluation are not differentiated from Korean listening evaluation for foreigners. They can not achieve the goal of Korean as a vernacular, which are reflected Korean national life. Because the scripts for evaluations are only converts of written text to oral text by reading aloud, there are not oral characteristics. And there are many speaking questions in critical comprehension parts. For improving the evaluations, I suggest some ideas. First, they should expand the listening ability to relational comprehension and control listening process of oneself beyond the language comprehension. Second, they should raise the degree of difficult according to the learner`s listening ability. Third, they should expend the area of listening evaluation. Those include activities of pre-listening, during listening and after listening. Those should evaluate the sympathatic listening and dialogic listening beyond analytic listening. They should include the visual contexts and digital language. At last, we should evaluate speaking ability as well as listening ability.