3.237.186.170
3.237.186.170
close menu
KCI 후보
우리말 노래 창작의 사상적 기반 -주체와 타자에 대한 담론을 중심으로
An Ideological Basis of Composing Songs in Korean: The Epistemological Relationship between the Self and the Other
임주탁 ( Ju Tak Yim )
국문학회 2007.11
국문학연구 16권 59-101(43pages)
UCI I410-ECN-0102-2012-810-002452763
* 발행 기관의 요청으로 이용이 불가한 자료입니다.

From the era of the Silla Dynasty through that of the Joseon Dynasty, the cultural elite of Korean society had been deeply involved in the composition, transmission, and preservation of the songs composed and sung in Korean, adjusting their attitudes whenever their ideological stance on the Korean language and the idea of the self changed. A rough chronological outline of significant historical moments in this regard is as follows: 1. Gyunyeo (均如) and Iryeon (一然), renowned Buddhist monks from the Goryeo Dynasty, recognized and emphasized that universal truth could be learned and reached through Korean vernacular, as well as through the Chinese language. Owing to this endorsement, the cultural elite of the nation participated actively in the production and consumption of Hyanga (鄕歌), popular songs orally transmitted in Korean, especially during the periods of national crisis, such as the invasions of the Kitans (契丹族) and the Mongols (蒙古族). 2. King Sejong (世宗) of the Joseon Dynasty was working on this very legacy when he invented the Korean alphabet Hangul and used it to compose Yong-bi-eo-cheon-ga (龍飛御天歌) to glorify his royal ancestors. In doing so, he provided his people, who could speak only Korean, with an opportunity to read and learn about the ancestors of the new dynasty, who, he believed, were now immortalized in heaven. 3. The idea that Gyunyeo and Iryeon shared with Sejong had gradually weakened since the lint half of the sixteenth century, when two Confucian scholars, Tweghyeh (退溪) and Yulgok (栗谷), developed alternative discourses on the Korean language. While Tweghyeh denied the value of Korean as a language for philosophical truth, Yulgok seems to have been more optimistic about the capacity of his mother tongue. Nevertheless, they both composed songs in Korean-respectively, Do-san-sib-i-gok (陶山十二曲) and Go-san-gu-gok-ga (高山九曲歌)-to describe the self-sufficient lifestyle of the Junzi (君子), or man of virtue, seeking truth in the world. Their emphasis on a premeditated set of rhythm in composition, however, provided an ideological basis for the syllabic verse known as Sijo (時調), which became popular among the cultural elite in subsequent generations. 4. Between the end of the seventeenth century and the beginning of the eighteenth century, another group of Confucian scholars noted that the popular songs sung by the common people might be in some sense more appropriate to express natural emotions of the Koreans than the highly artificial syllabic verse form of Sijo. Damheon (湛軒), for instance, maintained that the Koreans should distinguish themselves from the Chinese as they were the subject of their own thoughts and emotions. It was under the influence of him and his colleagues that the once-disregarded genre of Hyanga was rediscovered and revitalized to appear frequently in contemporary song collections. The history of the Korean songs had thus been affected by the ways in which the cultural elites of Korean society defined the relationship between the Korean and the Chinese language, and, consequently, by the ideas of the self or subject that they had cultivated. When they were able to widen their idea of the self to embrace the common people, the cultural elite of the Goryeo and Joseon Dynasties did not hesitate to recognize Korean as a poetic and philosophical language, whereas, when they needed to differentiate themselves from the common people, they disregarded the very linguistic medium that their social inferiors used to communicate and compose songs, as well.

[자료제공 : 네이버학술정보]
×