This study`s purpose is to disclose the segmentation aspects between historical nonfiction and modern historical novel. The latter is related to the former from the point of view of sharing with correct idea on history. However, as a matter of discourse those are two different things. This study`s the ultimate objective is to examine these two writings` dynamic phases competing each other. In addition to it, this study verifies the assumption that between them the relative importance of narrative moved from correct idea on history to composition sense in the writers posture, from facts to fictions, and from history`s lessons to amusements in the readers` hope horizon. Therefore this study will suggest a new paradigm to reconstruct the history of modern historical literature in Korea which is summarized in antagonism and eclecticism between correct idea on history to composition sense.