The 21st century has shown us the creation of different form of new media such as smart phones and Twitter, evolved from cell phones and computers. This paper shows detailed research on forms of poetic metaphor in the earlier times. First, using television as the material, poet Park, Nam-Chul introduced "display" media as a work of art. Here, we can find the form of poetry in which image and sound are simultaneously converted to the type image. Although the technique used in the poem is as destructive as the characteristic clarity of television, it also conceived the aesthetics of sizzle metaphor, making it possible to predict the sense organ of the text Next, poet Ha, Jae-Bong showed in his poem anonymity and openness of the internet, one of the most powerful forms in popular culture established until this day. Fitting to the internet communication characterized as non-linear, non-linear metaphor is bred to keep order and stability while appearing as chaos at the same time. This paper or analyzes the instability of the poetical circles that are not only being deprived of attention from the popular realm and academia but are also showing signs of mutual lack of interest among themselves, and focuses on the role of the public reader as a remedy to this. First, a direct survey was conducted to investigate the attitudes held by members of society toward poetical works. Despite the fact that as long as poetry is an art it should display the rigorous creative spirit demanded of those aspiring to reach the highest stage of artistic culture, with few exceptions many so-called poems published today are merely combinations of insipid words or enumerations of sentences that are apparently devoid of any kind of serious contemplation. This is also a general problem of Korea`s literary community in which literary magazines constantly spring up like mushrooms after rain. Thus many professional readers - literary researchers or critics - are still holding poets accountable for the problems of these works and looking for answers from among them. but this paper puts forth the perspective that it is not appropriate to place all responsibility for the atrophy of the genre known as poetry on the poets.