The subordinate clause in Old English (OE) exhibits 5 different surface word orders such as AUX-V-O, AUX-O-V, V-AUX-O, O-AUX-O, O-V-AUX with regard to the positions among AUX, V and O but the order V-O-AUX is not found. It is proposed in this article that OE subordinate word orders are derived via the application of Object Shift and V(AUX)-raising on the assumption that the base order of Old English is uniformly AUX/V-O. The assumption is based on the Linear Correspondence Axiom (LCA), which requires linearization between two syntactic objects by asymmetric c-commanding. In the meantime, the V-O-AUX order is denied by the FOFC that rules out the possibility of a head-final phrase dominating a head-initial phrase.