Nelson Goodman contends that we make worlds by making world- versions. Though Israel Scheffler approves of Goodman`s epistemological pluralism, he cannot accept Goodman`s thesis of worldmaking. He disagrees with Goodman in that he cannot accept the idea that we make the things to which our versions refer. For Goodman, we make a star by putting its parts together and marking off its boundaries. Scheffler argues that just because we make words, it does not follow that we make a star our words describe; it exists independent of us. I try to make plausible the idea of worldmaking. Following Goodman`s rejection of the distiction between natural and artificial kinds and the convention/ fact dualism, I think it may be crucial in arguing for the contention that there is no independent world with fixed properties. I believe that our choice of convention or version creates or shapes content or the things of a world. For Goodman, art also contributes to the making of worlds. I discuss it in case of painting. I examine Goodman`s view of pictorial reference to show how paintings can have cognitive content. Here, it is remarkable that exemplification is a mode of reference whereby a painting refers to its own features. I also discuss that the discrimination of style is an integral aspect to get the insight paintings present.