3.138.110.119
3.138.110.119
close menu
KCI 등재
"어떻게"의 담화 맥락적 분석
A contextual analysis of discourse of "uttuke"
윤정화 ( Jung Hwa Yoon )
한국언어문화 45권 267-295(29pages)
UCI I410-ECN-0102-2012-490-002841340

The current paper analyzed an interrogative ``uttuke`` which is diversely interpreted in ordinary discourse situations. ``Uttuke`` in general interrogative sentences is also interpreted as content covering the whole discourse situation besides vocabulary meanings including ``X-method``, ``X-shape``, ``X-reason`` etc. Especially, if it is combined with specific verbs such as ``Doida``, ``Boda``, ``Oda`` ``Hada`` and so on, it is possible to interpret it in a more expanded way. ``Uttuke`` in ``uttuke doida`` covers all the processes or methods leading to results. In ``uttuke boda`` it was analyzed as ``uttuke bogo``, ``uttuke bomyun`` etc., ``uttuke`` here was found to indicate a standard or a level etc. to measure an object. ``Uttuke hada`` allowed one to interpret it very diversely depending on each situation. In the combination of ``uttuke`` and verbal endings, statement sentence, rhetorical question sentence, and imperative sentence and so forth were divided to examine. It was observed that in the statement sentence it plays a role of an interrogative try to change the unknown into the known but it shows a speaker`s attitude which is not active but passive. In the rhetorical question sentence, it was found that it indicated the speaker`s ``strong denial`` but in the inside of utterance, her unsatisfied emotion was connoted. In the imperative sentence it was also interpreted differently depending on whether ``uttuke`` is or not and while in sentences where ``uttuke`` was not employed, it was only confirmed whether an achievement was done or not, in sentences where ``uttuke`` was included, it indicates that the results were already made, and it signifies the ``process``, ``methods``, and ``procedures`` through which they came to be made and ``their status`` or ``their levels`` etc. Since ``uttuke`` provides more comprehensive meanings than other interrogatives, it allows use to interpret it diversely depending on the discourse situations. In addition, as euphemistic and indirect questions are possible in the discourse situations, it makes it possible to carry out the discourse weakening forcibleness of demanding a response the interrogative sentence has and minimizing emotional damage of the counterpart.

[자료제공 : 네이버학술정보]
×