The purpose of this study is to show the effects of writing proposal and quasi-research paper for satisfying with the standards of KEC 2005 made by ABEEK. I examined the 29 papers submitted for two semesters from 2010 to 2011 by the students taking the class ``Writing in Science and Technology`` in Seoul National University. The goal of those papers was to solve the social problems using the knowledge and technique from majors. At the stage of writing proposal, discussion teams pointed out many problems against presentation teams, mainly including subjective understanding for social needs, standpoint of technological determinism, effectiveness of the research results. Interestingly, all the teams well picked up the similar problems about other teams` papers, but they strongly tended to make the same mistakes that they pointed out to other teams. Most presentation teams accepted the problems and corrected them, and submitted the final papers properly. This case study suggests that discussion of peer reviewers in the process of writing proposal and paper can successfully contribute to satisfying with the standards of KEC 2005.