This paper explores an assumption that crucial aspects of language can be studied as part of the natural world in the sense of the biolinguistic approach. In an effort to establish what should be contained in the study of biolinguistics, Bird (2006) recently proposed that biolinguistics should adopt the research scope of experimental psycholinguistics rather than Chomsky`s (2001b, 2004, 2005, 2006a,b) and Hauser, Chomsky, and Fitch`s (2002) strongly biological-linguistic one. The present article maintains that while Bird`s endeavor is still worth pursuing, the essence of research agenda is the one that Lee(2006) had, namely, a return to a research framework espoused by Chomsky (2001b, 2004, 2005, 2006a,b), Jenkins (2000, 2004) and the like, connecting biolinguistics to minimalism with focus on the aspects of principled explanation, computational efficiency, Merge, etc in accordance with the Strong Minimalist Thesis (SMT).