This study considered the characteristics, similarities, and differences of 1, 2, and 3 dimension classifiers. It was analyzed into the semantic meaning analysis method based on appearance classifiers between in Korean and in Chinese. Korean appearance classifiers have ‘Kadak(가닥), Karak(가락), Kaebi(개비)’(one dimension);‘ Jang(장), Mae(매), Nip(닢)’(two dimension); ‘Al(알), Tol(톨), Bangwool(방울), Jeng(정), Mo(모) ’(3dimension)and soon, Chinese appearance classifiers have ‘Dao1(道1), Gen(根), Gu(股), Liu(류), Lou(縷), Si(絲), Xian(線), Shu1(束1), Tiao(條)’(1dimension); ‘Pian(片), Zhang(張), Dao2(道2)’(2dimension); ‘Ke(顆), Li(粒), Di(滴), Wan(丸), Kuai(塊), Shu2(束2)’(three dimension). These common meaning qualities are [-width],[-height],[±length], [±large size], [±flexibility](one dimension); [+width], [-height], [±flexibility] (two dimension); [+width],[+height],[±circle], [±solid] (three dimension), etc.