18.218.38.125
18.218.38.125
close menu
KCI 등재
The derivation aspects of English and Korean fragments: non-repair strategy vs repair strategy
( Ick Hee Ihm )
언어와 언어학 69권 71-105(35pages)
UCI I410-ECN-0102-2016-700-000208404

The main purpose of this paper is to examine how fragment answers of English and Korean are derived. So far, in connection with the derivation of English fragments, there have been ``repair-by- PF-deletion`` analysis and scopal parallelism approach. However, these analyses have problems and so, as an alternative, I will adopt Barros, Elliott, and Thomas``(2014) three evasion strategies analysis. However, the strategies reveal their limit to the application for the derivation of Korean fragment answers. With respect to the derivation of Korean fragments, I will propose ``Percolation plus repair-by-PF-deletion`` analysis.

1. Introduction
2. Problem and limit of Merchant’s mechanism
3. Griffithus and Liptak's(2012) problem
4. Barros, Elliott, and Thomas(2014):
three strategies as non-repair approach
5. Korean fragment answer
6. Concluding remarks
References
[자료제공 : 네이버학술정보]
×