The purpose of this study is to qualitatively analyze the discourses and arguments between plaintiffs and defendants to determine what kind of indexicals they use to achieve social behavior. In this study, I look at the process and practice of context dependent language use and describe the relationship between narrated and narrating events. Public trial involves a litigant or a lawyer making a statement or claim in court. The first listener is the judge; the people listening to the discourse through their televisions constitute the second listener. The final judgment is judged by the first hearer and the second hearer helps to make a fair judgment. The attorney is responsible for delivering the citizen`s legal request to the national judicial authority. The judge makes an objective and fair judgment based on the public`s trust. In order to perform the discourse analysis procedure effectively, QSR Nvivo11, a qualitative analysis program, was used. The common nodes were “the case and the law,” “institutional supplement,” and “reality of marriage.” The social behavior achievement pattern was analyzed and plotted based on these three nodes.