3.128.78.41
3.128.78.41
close menu
KCI 등재
“繼續”動詞副詞兼類說異議
金鐘讚
중국어문학지 61권 205-220(16pages)
UCI I410-ECN-0102-2018-700-003748045

Up to now, many grammarians argue that the term “Jixu” only functions as a predicate, not as an adverbial. Xingfuyi argues that Jixu” not only can function as a predicate, but also can fill the role of an adverbial. Grammarians make inductions from language facts. If any grammar made by grammarians doesn’t accord with actual language, the grammar rule should be denied. In this point, Xingfuyi’s viewpoint is quite correct. Xingfuyi, furthermore, argues that when “Jixu” acts as an adverbial, it is an adverb. But according to my study, “Jixu” should be analyzed as a transitive verb and an intransitive verb. Of course, the meaning of the transitive verb “Jixu” is not exactly the same as the intransitive verb “Jixu” and only the latter can function both an adverbial and a predicate.

[자료제공 : 네이버학술정보]
×