An Investigation of the Teaching Evaluation Questionnaires on the Compulsory Chinese Courses of Suwon University
This paper takes the two kinds of teaching evaluation questionnaires implemented in compulsory Chinese courses of Suwon University as the objects of study, to examine their compositions and compare their similarities and differences. The most significant difference between them is that < questionnaire 1 > includes students' self-evaluation of learning attitude, while < questionnaire 2 > does not. Learning attitude includes three items: attendance, completion of the assignment, and personal effort. This paper argues that the evaluation results based on < questionnaire 2 > lack objectivity, because there is a significant positive linear correlation between learning attitude (attendance, assignment, personal effort) and teaching evaluation scores. In the teaching evaluation, students are an important variable that can not be ignored. Without considering this point, the teacher’s evaluation scores will lack objectivity and credibility.