本文根据與‘從OV出(來/去)’的對比,集中探討了現代漢語‘V出O(來/去)’的起点論元的韻律特征和非指示性義,幷對其産生的原因進行了闡釋。
首先,本文通過對名詞中心語進行定語附加的方式對‘V出O(來/去)’的起点論元的韻律特征進行了測試,同時,采用定量分析考察了‘V出O(來/去)’的起点論文的音節分布。我們得出了‘V出O(來/去)’的起点論元具有音節較短的傾向性的結論,我們認爲這種傾向性與現代漢語韻律規則,語言類型學中的連接語原理以及‘出’的語法化程度密切相關。
其次,根据‘V出O(來/去)’的起点論元位置不能出現疑問代詞,本文認爲‘V出O(來/去)’的起点論元排斥非指示性成分,我們認爲這種對非指示性含義的排斥與對同一場景進行不同的槪念化認知方式有關,卽‘V出O(來/去)’是通過總體掃描的方式進行識解的表達,不能出現非指示性成分,而‘從OV出(來/去)’則是采用序列掃描的方式産生的結構,因此能勾允准非指示性成分的出現。
This paper concentrates on exploring the prosody feature and inreferentiality of the source argument of VchuO(lai/qu) by comparing it with those in the congOVchu(lai/qu).
First, this paper tests the prosody feature of the source argument of VchuO(lai/qu) with the manner of adding noun modifier to the head noun. In addition, the syllable distribution of the source argument of VchuO(lai/qu) through statistical is analyzed through using corpus. From this, it is concluded that there is some tendency that the source argument of VchuO(lai/qu) prefer the short syllable to the others. On the basis of that, this paper claims that this kind of rhythmical tendency is closely connected with the prosody rules, relator principle in a linguistic typological approach, and the degree of grammaticalization of chu.
Second, because of the impossibility of interrogative pronoun in the position of the source argument of VchuO(lai/qu), the source argument of VchuO(lai/qu) excludes the referentialitive meaning. This paper asserts the reason of this inreferentiality of the source argument of VchuO(lai/qu) is correlated with scanning manners of the same event scene in Cognitive Grammar. In another word, the scanning manner of VchuO(lai/qu) is summary scanning, so there is no possibility of the inreferentialitive component. However, differently, the scanning manner of congOVchu(lai/qu) is sequential scanning, so it can give permission to the inreferentialitive component.