目前學術界關于類詞綴的判定標准任然沒有達成統一共識。所以就出現了有些詞到底是不是類詞綴這樣的問題，由于判定的標准不同，也就引起了學者們的分岐。本論文所討論的‘盲’就是這樣一個値得大家深思討論的問題。根据硏究表明，大部分學者還是認爲盲不是類詞綴，但也有小部分學者把’盲‘視爲類詞綴，可是幷沒有分析把’盲‘看作類詞綴的原因。因此本論文按照類詞綴判定的基本標准：意義標准，結構標准，功能標准這三個方面對’盲‘進行了分析，根据‘盲’的詞義變化，‘盲’的構詞結構，以及‘盲’的能産功能分析，最后得出‘盲’的確可以被看作是一個類詞綴的結論。除此之外，本論文還結合各時代特征要求，分析了‘X盲’類詞匯的原因背景。充分證明了‘盲’作爲一個類詞綴的發展性。

At present, there is no consensus on the criteria for judging affixes in academic circles. Therefore, there are some problems such as whether the words are affixed or not. Because of the different criteria for judgment, they have caused differences among scholars. The ‘盲’ discussed in this paper is such a question worthy of deep discussion. According to research, most scholars still believe that 盲 is not a affix, but a small number of scholars regard ‘盲’ as a suffix, but they do not analyze the reason why ‘盲’ is regarded as a suffix. Therefore, this paper analyzes the ‘盲’ in terms of the basic criteria of class affixation: meaning standard, structural standard and functional standard. According to the meaning change of ‘盲’, the structure of ‘盲’ word formation, The analysis of the function of energy production, and finally the conclusion that ‘盲’ can be regarded as a suffix. In addition, this paper also analyzes the background of the ‘X-盲‘ vocabulary in combination with the characteristics of each era. It fully proves the development of ‘盲’ as a suffix.