3.137.213.128
3.137.213.128
close menu
KCI 등재
협박과 회유의 이중 담화전략 ― 환구시보(環球時報) “화위(華爲)”, “맹만주(孟晩舟)”, “캐나다(加拿大)” 관련 사설 비판적 담화분석
Threatening and Conciliating as Double Layered Linguistic Strategies: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Editorials on Huawei, Meng Wanzhou, and Canada in The Global Times, Huánqiú Shíbào
최태훈
중국언어연구 81권 245-275(31pages)
DOI 10.38068/KJCL.81.10
UCI I410-ECN-0102-2019-700-001659067

This research explores the textual description, intertextual interpretation, and social contexts explanation of 13 editorials on Huawei, Meng Wanzhou, and Canada published in The Global Times, Huánqiú Shíbào between Dec. 12th, 2018 and Jan. 29th, 2019 with the focused editorial of Dec. 16th titled Let the Country Pursuing the Invasion of China’s Interests Pay the Price. Employing a method established by Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis(CDA), the first findings of the textual description center around the emergence of an allies in the context of U.S.-China Trade War by using 1) different linguistic strategies toward the countries of Five Eyes, 2) contrastive address terms that show mixed signals, 3) a war frame, and 4) an expert voice. Second, intertexuality interpreted from the titles and main ideas of 12 relevant editorials reveals the repetitive linguistic strategy patterns including 1) the ambiguity strategy toward U.S., 2) the double layered linguistic strategies including threatening and conciliating expressions toward Australia, New Zealand, and Canada, and 3) avoidance strategy toward U.K. Third, the findings discuss and explain the underlying social conditions in which the editorials of The Global Times attempt to convince the readers that China needs to crack the US intelligence alliance called Five Eyes so that the Chinese government can succeed to lead the 5th generation network business through Huawei and therefore wish the success of Made in China 2025, a blueprint to upgrade the Chinese manufacturing policy in the pursuit of high value products and services.

1. 서론
2.「讓仗勢侵害中國利益的國家付出代價」의 텍스트 특성
3. “華爲”, “孟晩舟”, “加拿大” 관련 사설들의 상호텍스트성
4. “華爲”, “孟晩舟”, “加拿大” 관련 사설들의 사회적 맥락
5. 결론
[자료제공 : 네이버학술정보]
×