This study aims at clarifying semantic and syntactic features of adjective 'chakha- changing from NP's [+human] or [+attribute related to human] which 'chakharequires as semantic argument to [+thing] or [+attribute of thing to be judged as to be good to others] added to them. If new concept is appeared, it is very often used to the form borrowed from existed one which have similar concept. But when the new concept borrows existed form, the syntactic structures manifested on sentence is independently used. The value using each syntactic structure, in other words, is different. Chakha- have [+thing] or [+attribute of thing to be judged as to be good to others] have special characteristics. The first, it very often, companies with emphasis mark(‘’) in internet corpus. The second, supplementary sentences(post or pre), coexist mostly with it, because the meaning of Chakha- changed could not be easily approached to people. The third, the form of Chakha- is possible to both Predicate one and prenominal one. The fourth, remarkability of changeness has temporal and functional property such as name of program, company, and drama, etc. The fifth, the many ones among the phrase included in Chakha- is to deserved to apply to principles of Generic Objectiveness. (Daegu University)