글로버메뉴 바로가기 본문 바로가기 하단메뉴 바로가기

논문검색은 역시 페이퍼서치

한국어 의미학검색

Korean Semantics


  • - 주제 : 어문학분야 > 국어학
  • - 성격 : 학술지
  • - 간기: 계간
  • - 국내 등재 : KCI 등재
  • - 해외 등재 : -
  • - ISSN : 1226-7198
  • - 간행물명 변경 사항 :
논문제목
수록 범위 : 52권 0호 (2016)

전염병 보도 프레임 연구

박건숙 ( Keon-sook Park )
한국어의미학회|한국어 의미학  52권 0호, 2016 pp. 1-29 ( 총 29 pages)
6,400
초록보기
The purpose of this study is toreveal the characteristics of the infectious disease news, further toestablish a frame of epidemic diseases news through the analysis ofvocabulary epidemic and related words. To this end, We haveanalyzed the vocabulary of KBS 9 o’clock News statistically from2001 to 2015. And studied around the swine flu {Sinjongpeullu} andMERS {Mereuseu}. The results were as follows:First, {Sinjongpeullu/Mereuseu} news, there are differences in theappearance aspects related terms as compared to the cancer {Am} orthe flu {Dokgam}. Second, we present three frames in the{Sinjongpeullu/Mereuseu} news: the control frame for preventing thespread of infectious diseases, national disaster frame emphasized therisk of epidemics frame, economic crisis frame is focused on theimpact the epidemic on the economy. Third, the political andeconomic areas related terms have increased significantly in theMERS news than swine flu news. This shows that intervention ofgovernmental agencies is even greater in the MERS time than theswine flu. Also it means that the more important to recognize theeconomic crisis caused by infectious diseases than in the past. Thestudy presents what the focus of the news when an epidemic occurs,the revealed target to recognize what our society is important.

복수 표현의 복수성과 화용적 의미

정상희 ( Sang Hee Jeong )
한국어의미학회|한국어 의미학  52권 0호, 2016 pp. 31-59 ( 총 29 pages)
6,400
초록보기
This studyaims to reveal pragmatic property of plural expressions in Korean onthe basis of semantic plurality. Korean plural expression such as tul,ney have studied mostly on their semantic plurality. However,interesting phenomena are observed. That is, Korean plural expressionsserve as pragmatic markers which present honorific, modesty andnon-formality, even without plural reading in certain cases. To figureout the reason of this, I clarify plural meaning and pragmaticproperty of tul, ney, ttawi. Besides, it is considered that they aresystematically co-related. Thus I suggested plurality-informalitysystem schematically

구어 의문문 어미의 문법성과 화용성 -여성 자유발화의 억양 분석을 통하여-

조민하 ( Min-ha Jo )
한국어의미학회|한국어 의미학  52권 0호, 2016 pp. 61-85 ( 총 25 pages)
6,000
초록보기
The purposeof this study was to reconsider both grammaticality and pragmaticsof interrogative ending in spoken language. We analyzed theintonation of 35 women’s spontaneous speech with a length of300minutes and drew the following conclusions freom the analysis.First, Most endings that realized interrogative sentence in spokenlanguage were found evenly in declarative sentence and interrogativesentence and showed difference only in functions and degree ofmeaning. Second, intonation had lower extent of contribution as thefunctional strength of interrogative sentence was higher. By contrast,intonation had higher extent of contribution as the functional strengthof interrogative sentence was lower. Grammaticality and pragmaticswere inter-complementary. Third, intonation was combined withmorphological elements and involved in pragmatic functions.Non-assertive endings were combined with ‘L:’, ‘LH’, and ‘LHL’ to beused in soft and polite expressions. Confirmative and assertiveendings were combined with ‘H’, ‘HL:’, and ‘LHL’ to be used inassertive expressions. Fourth, As the higher, use of flexibleintonation and forms revealing confidence was more common, andfurthermore, politeness strategy based on prosody elements was usedmore commonly

한국어의 습관상에 대하여 -"-곤 하-"의 습관상 설정 가능성에 대하여-

김천학 ( Cheon-hak Kim )
한국어의미학회|한국어 의미학  52권 0호, 2016 pp. 87-109 ( 총 23 pages)
5,800
초록보기
This paper aims to research into the expression of thehabitual aspect in Korean. Habitual aspect has been contained to theaspectual categories in grammar. In Comrie(1976), the aspectualcategories are divided into Perfective and Imperfective and Habitualis contained to the Imperfective as a subordinate constituent. InEnglish, there is a past habitual marker like ‘used to’, while it isdifficult to find whether the habitual aspect can be expressed or notin Korean. In preceding researches, it is reported that the ‘-ko iss-’can be expressed to the habitual aspect. However it needs todistinguish the habitual aspect to the iterative that can be expressedby the punctual verbs. If the punctual verbs combine with theprogressive ‘-ko iss-’ in Korean, the meaning of the expression canbe interpreted as the constraint frequency. Though the habitualmeaning is same the iterative as the repetition of a situation, there isa difference to the time span between them. The ‘-ko iss-’ expressesthe iterative situation that is a constraint period of time; however thehabitual expresses the iterative situation that is an extended period oftime as a whole period. Meanwhile, the ‘-kon ha-’ can be interpretedto the iterative as a contextual meaning in Korean, so it can be dealtwith the habitual aspect like ‘used to’ in English. However there aresome differences between them. The ‘-kon ha-’ describes an iterativesituation as an incidental property of time; however the ‘used to’expresses an iterative situation as a characteristic feature of a wholeperiod. As a result, the ‘-kon ha-’ could be regarded as an iterativeaspect marker in Korean, it might be developed to the habitualmarker via the grammaticalization

과학 텍스트 정의문의 유형 분석

남길임 ( Kilim Nam )
한국어의미학회|한국어 의미학  52권 0호, 2016 pp. 111-138 ( 총 28 pages)
6,300
초록보기
The purpose of this study is toclassify defining sentences in science textbooks and analyse them onthe basis of their lexico-grammatical patterns as well as their rolesin the text. Many studies have focused on the concepts of ‘definingstrategy’ or ‘defining sentence types’ in lexicography. In addition, theuse of defining strategies appears to be more important in scienceprose, when describing scientific terms, than in any other fields.While previous studies have examined definition in Koreandictionaries, only a few have looked into what grammaticalcharacteristics the science textbooks present in terms of definingstrategy and what role these various patterns play in definingscientific terms. This study is organized as follows. Chapter 2 dealswith issues relating to the analysis of the defining sentences andpresents the methodology and corpus construction. Chapter 3classifies the Korean defining sentences by analysing the definitionpatterns of Korean dictionaries. Chapter 4 analyzes manually 200defining sentences in Korean science textbooks and classifies themaccording to not only their lexico-grammatical patterns but also theirfunctions

부사의 의미론 <어휘적 관점에서>

손남익 ( Nam-ik Son )
한국어의미학회|한국어 의미학  52권 0호, 2016 pp. 139-161 ( 총 23 pages)
5,800
초록보기
The purpose of this paper is to classifyKorean adverbs. The one classification is sentence adverb andcomponent adverb. The other is free adverb and constraint adverb.Korean adverb categorize conjunctive, mood, time, location, manner,degree, symbol, negative. Conjunctive adverb categorize ‘and’, ‘but’,cause-and-effect, selection. Mood adverb can divide supposition,emphasis, amplification, doubt, reason, change, assumption, conviction,negation. Time adverb can classify past, present, future, moment,continue. Location adverb can classify standstill, move. Manneradverb can classify frequency, manner. Degree adverb can divide 4grade. Symbol adverb’s meaning can be show by subject and verb.Negation adverb are composed by ‘can not’ and ‘will not’, ‘can not’indicate ability and ‘will not’ indicate will. The adverb’s meaningexhibit it’s meaning by itself, not depend on syntax and othercomponents.

부사의 비대칭적 사용 양상 연구 -구어에 쓰인 "막, 좀/이렇게, 그렇게"를 중심으로-

조민적 ( Min Jeong Jo )
한국어의미학회|한국어 의미학  52권 0호, 2016 pp. 163-195 ( 총 33 pages)
6,800
초록보기
This study intends to investigate asymmetric use of adverbs which are used very frequently in spoken not in written. First of all ‘mak, jom’ are used to achieve the communicative aims, and also ‘irekhe, jerekhe’ are mainly used by virtue of simple and more involvement in spoken. Lastly, those words’ functions differ from each other in written and spoken by according to three tests which are a substitution of ‘maku, jokum’, a possibility of deletion, and those’s distribution in the syntactic structure. I have tried to show ‘mak’ is mainly used in one-way, while ‘jom’ in two-way talks. And also ‘mak’ is used by younger or illierate speaker but ‘jom’ is neutral in that sense. The next thing ‘irekhe, jerekhe’ have the use that substitutes its antecedents or postcedents besides deictic use and also emphasizes post words, and situations that are occurred in.

2원 네트워크 분석을 이용한 한국어 강조정도부사의 의미 거리 연구

정성훈 ( Sung Hoon Jung )
한국어의미학회|한국어 의미학  52권 0호, 2016 pp. 197-222 ( 총 26 pages)
6,100
초록보기
This paper aims to set upthe types of adverbs that is so-called “Emphasizing Degree Adverbs”in Sejong Written Corpus and examine the semantic diastance ofEmphasizing Degree Adverbs using 2-mode network analysis. Firstof all, I will show the types of Korean Emphasizing Degree Adverbsand calculate the relation between Adverbs and Predicates using theLog-likelihood ratio test such as G-test. Based on the outcome ofthat, I will establish significant relationship between EmphasizingDegree Adverbs and Predicates in Korean languages and build the2-mode network structure. In conclusion, I claim that it is possible tomeasure the meaning distances of Emphasizing Degree Adverbswhich are not able to be understood by people’s intuition. I furtherclaim that the Korean Emphasizing Degree Adverbs can be largelydivided into 8 clusters and the biggest cluster is divided into 3 smallclusters again.

한국어 부사 연구에 있어서의 쟁점과 과제 -담화,화용적 관점에서-

한송화 ( Song Hwa Han )
한국어의미학회|한국어 의미학  52권 0호, 2016 pp. 223-250 ( 총 28 pages)
6,300
초록보기
Korean adverb is one of part of speech that iscategorized by meaning, form and function in sentences. The functionof adverbs is said that they modify verbs in sentences or they modifysentences at beginning sentences. But Korean adverbs have variousfunctions in discourse. The first, ‘그런데, 그리고, 그러나, ...’ amongthe adverbs are used for intensifying cohesion in discourse. And ‘근데, 그니까, 그래서, 그럼, 하여튼, ...’ among the adverbs are used asdiscourse markers that display discourse border such as introduction,change and finishing of topic. ‘그니까, 하긴, 설마, ...’ are used assemi-yes/no responses and ‘정말, 진짜, 그냥, ...’ are used as speechact sentences for demanding or threatening in conversations. And ‘혹시, 아마, 그냥, 막, ...’ are used as discourse markers that strengthenor weaken speaker’s speech representing for speaker’s mentalattitudes. Lastly the functions of ‘차라리, 오히려, 물론, ...’ can beknown through discourse premise

강조어 "완전"의 사용에 대한 고찰 -구어와 통신언어를 중심으로-

엽영임 ( Yinglin Ye ) , 양명희 ( Myung-hee Yang )
한국어의미학회|한국어 의미학  52권 0호, 2016 pp. 251-269 ( 총 19 pages)
5,400
초록보기
In the Korean dictionary,‘wanjeon’(완전) is described as a noun, however in the internetlanguage and spoken language it is often used as an intensifier whichmeans ‘very or quite’. So far, research about ‘wanjeon’ was mainlyfocused on its syntactic and semantic characteristics. However, thereare few research that is concerned about wanjeon’s characteristics asan intensifier. Therefore, this research aims to study ‘wanjeon’ as anintensifier and how its usage transformed in parts of speech and thesemantic characteristics. Moreover, the paper will compare thedifferences of syntactic and semantic features between ‘wanjeonhi’(완전히) in internet language and spoken language. According to SejongSpoken Corpus, we can clearly observe the manifestations of wanjeonwhen it was used as an intensifier in definite sentences. Meanwhile,we can find wanjeon’s semantic prosodic characteristics when it wasused as an intensifier, and how gender-difference and hierarchyaffect the usage of wanjeon
1