Learner`s emotional experience of literature is considered as a process or result of education. But there seems to be no earnest discussion investigating the basis of the practice to offer a norm of evaluation. This study observe that the literary canonical works and system, agreed with as that true basis of evaluation, are actually weak to have a theoretical-practical properness endowing learner`s experience with justiciability. The aim of this Study is to verify the modes, registers, and process of literary canon in Korea, and the hierarchic structure of emotional experience of literature as canonical authority effort. To demonstrate this, I discuss two subjects as follows: 1. In Korea, the canon of literary education materializes as a system not representative works. According to the way of materialization of literary canon in textbook, learner`s cultural circumstance, and latent curriculum, an organic view of literature, as the canonical system, causes some specific literary experience to be justified; so-called `Han(恨)` becomes the traditional emotional experience, and equilibrium the universal emotional experience. 2. Literary emotional experience is maintained as a sole value system with the hierarchy of emotion by literary canon system. It could be figured a Pyramid model. We can find that the model is widely diffused at various theoretical-practical fields dealing with value and standard. And I make some suggestions as follows: 1. We need convert the Pyramid model into `building block model`, and tolerate the relativity of literary and experiential value(furthermore, literary experiential value). 2. In order to it, release the taboo of literary emotional experience. 3. We also have to reformate, reconstruct, and historically contextualize of canon.