글로버메뉴 바로가기 본문 바로가기 하단메뉴 바로가기

논문검색은 역시 페이퍼서치

> 경상대학교 법학연구소 > 법학연구 > 17권 2호

증거동의와 증거능력에 관한 소고

Consent to Evidence and Admissibility of Evidence

김태계 ( Tae Kye Kim )

- 발행기관 : 경상대학교 법학연구소

- 발행년도 : 2009

- 간행물 : 법학연구, 17권 2호

- 페이지 : pp.41-64 ( 총 24 페이지 )


학술발표대회집, 워크숍 자료집 중 1,2 페이지 논문은 ‘요약’만 제공되는 경우가 있으니,

구매 전에 간행물명, 페이지 수 확인 부탁 드립니다.

6,400
논문제목
초록(외국어)
Clause 1, Article 318 of the Criminal Procedure Act is prescribing as follows. The evidence has admissibility of evidence if concerned a party consents to the evidence. Therefore the evidence which the prosecutor submits has admissibility of evidence if the accused consents. We do not need to question the witness in the law cour1 then. The consent to evidence finishes the criminal procedure rapidly and makes charge cheap. AJI kind of the evidence comes under the consent about the evidence. The resignation of the cross-examination does not have any meaning about protocol of examination of a suspect. The consent to the evidence is not therefore the resignation of the cross-examination but this the resignation of the right. The right is a admissibility of evidence and probative power of the evidence. The method of consent to the evidence does not need to be the explict. It is possible to the revelation. The accused retreats from the law court and to regard as consent to evidence behind there violates. To leave the law court does not mean to give up the right. Regarding as consent about the evidence therefore after the accused leaves the law court is unjust.

논문정보
  • - 주제 : 사회과학분야 > 법학
  • - 발행기관 : 경상대학교 법학연구소
  • - 간행물 : 법학연구, 17권 2호
  • - 발행년도 : 2009
  • - 페이지 : pp.41-64 ( 총 24 페이지 )
  • - UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2012-360-001020433
저널정보
  • - 주제 : 사회과학분야 > 법학
  • - 성격 : 학술지
  • - 간기 : 계간
  • - 국내 등재 : KCI 등재
  • - 해외 등재 : -
  • - ISSN : 1975-2784
  • - 수록범위 : 1988–2021
  • - 수록 논문수 : 785