글로버메뉴 바로가기 본문 바로가기 하단메뉴 바로가기

논문검색은 역시 페이퍼서치

> 이중언어학회 > 이중언어학 > 69권 0호

한국어 논증적 글쓰기 교육을 위한 한ㆍ중 신문 사설 개입 대조 연구

A Contrastive Study of Engagement in Korean and Chinese Editorials for the Korean Argumentative Writing Education

맹강 ( Meng Gang )

- 발행기관 : 이중언어학회

- 발행년도 : 2017

- 간행물 : 이중언어학, 69권 0호

- 페이지 : pp.81-111 ( 총 31 페이지 )


학술발표대회집, 워크숍 자료집 중 1,2 페이지 논문은 ‘요약’만 제공되는 경우가 있으니,

구매 전에 간행물명, 페이지 수 확인 부탁 드립니다.

7,100
논문제목
초록(외국어)
This study aims to present the pedagogic implications about Korean Argumentative Writing Education for CKLs through contrasting the engagement in the editorials of Korean and Chinese. So we have selected 100 piece(Korean editorials 50, Chinese editorials 50)editorials from The Chosun Ilbo, The The JoongAng Ilbo and People’s Daily, Guang Ming Daily which are the representative newspapers of Korea and China. We extracted the engagement according to the Appraisal Theory which was developed by Martin & White(2005) and the context. Then we did a t-text and as a result, the total of monogloss and heterogloss didn’t have a statistically significant difference and both Korean and Chinese editorials have used more heterogloss than monogloss. In the dialogic expansion, we found that the use of possibility, entertain, attribution, distance and the total of dialogic expansion had a statistically significant difference and the use of personal opinion and acknowledge didn’t have a statistically significant difference. Though the average we can know that the Korean editorials used more possibility, entertain, attribution, distance than the Chinese editorials. And in the dialogic contraction we found that the use of disclaim, deny, counter, proclaim, concur, pronounce and the total of dialogic contraction all had a statistically significant difference but except the endorsement. Though on the average we can see that the Korean editorials used more disclaim, deny, counter than Chinese editorials but Chinese editorials used more proclaim, concur, pronounce than Korean editorials. It may suggest that in the Korean editorials expected rebuts were more taken into account and in the Chinese editorials one-sided argument was more preferred. Accordingly, when we teach Korean argumentative writing to CKLs we may need to tell them to use entertain, attribution, disclaim properly to take the expected rebuts into account and use less concur and pronounce. (Seoul National University)

논문정보
  • - 주제 : 어문학분야 > 언어학
  • - 발행기관 : 이중언어학회
  • - 간행물 : 이중언어학, 69권 0호
  • - 발행년도 : 2017
  • - 페이지 : pp.81-111 ( 총 31 페이지 )
  • - UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2018-700-003757900
저널정보
  • - 주제 : 어문학분야 > 언어학
  • - 성격 : 학술지
  • - 간기 : 계간
  • - 국내 등재 : KCI 등재
  • - 해외 등재 : -
  • - ISSN : 1229-1757
  • - 수록범위 : 1983–2022
  • - 수록 논문수 : 1235