This study focuses on how Korean teachers’ writing grading methods affect writing scores for advanced learners. In addition, we tried to examine the correlation between the evaluation criteria of analytic grading and the comprehensive grading, and to find out which sub-criteria has the greatest relevance among them. Lastly, it was examined whether the difference in experience of teaching Korean and the difference in their experience of grading TOPIK are factors that affect the writing scoring. To this end, 30 skilled Korean teachers who teach Korean at Korean language institutions in University with different backgrounds, including experience teaching Korean, advanced Korean learners’ education experience, and experience of grading TOPIK, grade advanced learner’s writing in comprehensive and analytic way. The results are as follows: First, raters differed in their writing scores according to the grading method, but they give more strict scores for analytical grading than comprehensive grading. Second, all five sub-criteria of analytic grading had high correlation with comprehensive grading. Lastly, the difference between the raters’ experience of teaching Korean and experience of grading TOPIK did not affect the analytic grading, but it was confirmed that the experience of grading TOPIK affected the Comprehensive grading. (Yonsei University)